Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
-
Recent Posts
Archives
- November 2013 (1)
- January 2013 (3)
- December 2012 (2)
- October 2012 (1)
- September 2012 (1)
- April 2012 (1)
- February 2012 (1)
- December 2011 (1)
- November 2011 (4)
- August 2011 (1)
- December 2010 (2)
- November 2010 (3)
- October 2010 (1)
- September 2010 (5)
- August 2010 (1)
- June 2010 (3)
- May 2010 (8)
- April 2010 (25)
- March 2010 (7)
- February 2010 (3)
Fathers Rights Groups
Related Links
Meta
Warning: Declaration of Social_Walker_Comment::start_lvl(&$output, $depth, $args) should be compatible with Walker_Comment::start_lvl(&$output, $depth = 0, $args = Array) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/social/lib/social/walker/comment.php on line 18
Warning: Declaration of Social_Walker_Comment::end_lvl(&$output, $depth, $args) should be compatible with Walker_Comment::end_lvl(&$output, $depth = 0, $args = Array) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/social/lib/social/walker/comment.php on line 42
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
parentalienated
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
Please let me see my son .. This book is about my story of Parental Alienation and an 11 year battle with Family Law.. I wrote it for a number of reasons;
So that others who may be subjected to PA can see some hope..
As a means of highlighting the holes that need plugging in UK Family Law and the current CAFCASS/social care system….
… and as a huge symbol of gratitude to Karen Woodall and The Centre for Separated Families (without whom I cannot imagine where my family would be now)
Profits from the book will go to CFS…
You are not alone… there IS hope !
Search for: Please let me see my son
Or go via.. http://www.amazon.co.uk/Please-Let-See-Son-alienation/dp/1781486166/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1379566930&sr=8-1&keywords=please+let+me+see+my+son
Please share this post..
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
David Mortimer
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
—– Original Message —–
From: david@mortimers-removals.co.uk
To: graylingc@parliament.uk
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 12:41 AM
Subject: The changes would “put back confidence” in the family justice system?
Rt. Hon Chris Grayling
Westminster
House of Commons
London
SW1A 0AA
020 7219 8194
graylingc@parliament.uk
Dear Chris Grayling,
Re: Justice Secretary Ken Clarke told the Today programme that the changes would “put back confidence” in the system, but accepted that the law would have to be drafted very carefully.
http://www.parliament.uk/biographies/commons/kenneth-clarke/25686
Please will you kindly tell me if you still think’ the governments current proposals ”will put back confidence in the system & why given that Harriet Harman stated in the national press on the 4th of June in 2006 that:
“I have concluded that it is now impossible to defend a system from accusations of bias and discrimination if it operates behind closed doors. Even as Minister for Family Justice, I find the rules make it hard for me to establish what is going on.
It is my job to reassure Parliament that the family court system is working properly. But how can I know? I can’t read newspaper reports of cases; I can’t just go and sit at the back of the court, as I can – and do – in magistrates’ courts. And how can MPs hold me to account for a system they cannot see? Parliamentary accountability for the family courts is wholly theoretical while the system remains closed. How can the influential Constitutional Affairs Select Committee conduct investigations into its workings?
And when we debate family law in Parliament, neither MP’s nor Ministers can really know what we are talking about. We have to legislate in the dark”.
There are many problems with how the family justice system works & yet none these ‘fundamental floors’ have been addressed by the governments current proposals.
I believe we need a Royal Commission into the workings of the children’s act since it was first introduced in 1989 & I would like to know if you will publicly state that you think it would be a good idea?
Yours Sincerely
David Mortimer
http://ukfathers.wordpress.com/2013/09/09/join-us-so-we-can-demand-real-change-redress/
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
davidmortimermiltonkeynes
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
How can anyone reasonably justify how the UK family courts operate or how our political representatives have failed to act in the best interests of children by changing the wording of the children’s act in the Children & Families bill to stop another generation of fatherless children.
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
twitter_ukfathers
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
Government only consults with those who they fund & they dictate which questions can be asked.
I have received a reply from our department of Education about the coalition governments proposed changes to the children’s act contained in the children & families bill. I have put it on the index page of my website & would like to know what you think about what the department of Education have said?
http://www.ukfamilylawreform.co.uk/
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
davidmortimermiltonkeynes
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
History proves what works & what is the right thing to do. It worked for the Australian fathers’ who now have a Royal Commission into child abuse & a better family law system. It’s not honorable men like Earl who take their own lives who will make a difference but those who will willingly give it’ who will be seen as the martas’ true defenders & champions of democracy, who defeated a tyrannous’ government which systematically abused families with impunity’ in the best interests of children.
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
davidmortimermiltonkeynes
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
A none resident parent will always be found guilty by a false allegation of domestic abuse in the family courts because a judge will always make a judgment on the side of caution but do not check to see if what has been said is true or not. You might wonder how any judgment could ever be reasonably considered as safe & in a child’s best interest if they do not check because to do so would undermind the authority of the primary care giver which would not be in the child’s best interests.
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
davidmortimermiltonkeynes
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
History proves what works & what is the right thing to do.
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
davidmortimermiltonkeynes
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
Please do what you can to help now
http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/why-yes-i-am-a-little-angry/
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
davidmortimermiltonkeynes
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
PAEDOPHILIA: How one piece of news can kill
http://hat4uk.wordpress.com/2013/03/08/paedophilia-how-one-piece-of-news-can-kill-a-novel/
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
davidmortimermiltonkeynes
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
Lord Justice Wall: Yes, indeed, I agree with that entirely, but sometimes if it is an issue of fact which has to be resolved, our system decrees that that is not done by the judge reading the papers and making a decision, but by oral evidence and cross-examination.
http://www.mensaid.com/fl-family_justice_inquiry-04-11-09.htm
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
davidmortimermiltonkeynes
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
Abuse of power by public servants is not tolerated by good, honest, decent’ right thinking citizens’ in a democratic’ law abiding society.
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
David Mortimer
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
When are family court judges going to start referring cases of perjury to the police given the Lord Chief Justices ruling?
“If a judge considers that the Police should pursue an investigation in respect of the commission of perjury by a witness or a party at a trail, the judge must make this clear in his judgment and make the necessary order so as to require the court to send the papers in the case to the Police or the appropriate authorities. If the judge does not make such a direction in the course of his judgment, then the Police can assume that there is no case of perjury to be investigated. However, should relevant evidence come to light, the aggrieved party may return to court to place the fact before a judge and/or appeal. It will then be open to that judge to give the aforementioned direction if appropriate”
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
David Mortimer
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
Please can you tell me why the rule of law that a father is the natural guardian of his legitimate child was abolished when the children’s act was introduced in 1989 given what is known about child abuse’ surely it is in the best interests of children to repeal the children’s act & change the rule of law so that a father is the natural guardian of his legitimate child?
The governments latest proposals are in fact’ the sole custody model of family law dressed up to be something different.
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
David Mortimer
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
I agree that the emphasis on ‘risk’ is part of the armoury of the feminists. The implication is that in every case, there may be risk – and a risk of what? Being shouted at? Being fed the wrong kind of cheese? The last figures I saw showed that a child was nine times more likely to be abused by a step-father. So, if this phrase cannot be removed, then it should be expanded to, “providing there is no risk to the child from a father, mother or the any man with whom the mother is cohabiting or having a relationship with”. I cannot see how those who are allegedly concerned about risk could argue that only a natural father needs to be examined closely when harm can and does come from mothers and their boyfriends who must logically be subjected to the same criteria as natural fathers. It may even be so radical and disturbing to the feminists that they may prefer the phrase to be pulled completely – worth a bluff because either way, we win!
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
David Mortimer
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
When the children’s act was introduced in 1989 (4) The rule of law that a father is the natural guardian of his legitimate child’ was abolished. The Act removed parents rights & replaced them with responsibilities.
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
David Mortimer
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
“Dear Judge Wall,
I attended the FNF AGM last Sunday and would like to make some comments on your talk. Firstly though I must make it clear that I am writing from as a purely private individual who happens to be a member of FNF. I neither hold an official post nor am I an official spokesman for FNF.
I would like to thank you for giving up your Sunday afternoon and coming along to give us the talk on what is a very emotive and controversial subject.
You made the point that we should be looking to Parliament to change the law, however, if we get a politician to speak at our next AGM, I can almost guarantee that (s)he will say that it is the fault of the courts and they cannot interfere with the courts. You both say “it’s them not us”, which, smacks of irresponsibility. It does, however, at least imply that both of you know that there is a problem, which is good news as this is the first step to solving it.
I have no wish to tell you the law, but surely the Children’s Act was made purposely vague to enable judges enough leeway so that they could fit the law to each individual case. To demonstrate the range of options open to judges we just need to look at opposing extremes. At one extreme, judges are allowed to give sole custody to the father and to ban the mother from seeing her children. At the other extreme they can give sole custody to the mother and ban the father from seeing his children. Judges can give any combination in-between these two extremes, why do you say that the law needs changing if you can make any order you wish, and why do you operate at only one extreme of the spectrum?
One thing that you repeatedly said is that it is the written into the Children’s Act that judges should base their decisions, primarily, on “the best interest of the children”. Forgive me for saying that your repeating of this seems to imply that you do not believe that the fathers in the room have the best interest of their children at heart. I find a particular arrogance of judges who think that they know better than parents do, what is best for children. May I point out that it is normally the case that judges do not even know the names of the children involved, they do not have to live for the rest of their lives with the consequences and they hold no responsibility for the outcome of their decisions. This is power without responsibility, which is absolute power. Despite this judges seem to have the arrogance to believe that that they know what is best for our children. Parents are almost the only people throughout your life that can be guaranteed to put you first above all other considerations. On this point I would like to make some other comments:
Firstly, you emphasise Domestic Violence (DV), although you do not go as far as saying the fathers should be barred from their children because of it. I would like to point out that throughout well over 100 reputable surveys carried out throughout the English speaking countries runs the theme that women commit just as much DV as men. There are no reputable surveys that say anything different. It has also been shown by the NSPCC that mothers commit 60% of child abuse and real fathers 9% with 31% being carried out by step-fathers live-in boyfriends and the like. Surely as far as DV is concerned it is “in the best interest of the children” to give full custody to the father and not put them with the mother where 91% of child abuse takes place. Why don’t they?
Secondly, by placing girls with their mothers you expose them to eight time the risk of sexual abuse from step-fathers, live in boyfriends and the like. Why do judges do this if they are committed to “in the best interest of the children”?
Thirdly, the main responsibilities a parent has for their children are to feed, clothe, and shelter them, for example it does not matter how much education they get if they starve and it does not matter how much “mothering” they get if they freeze to death. Throughout history, these main responsibilities have always been held by fathers, currently they are held by fathers (although the Government has made great effort to replace fathers with themselves paid for by fathers) and fathers will hold this responsibility for the foreseeable future, for mothers are very unlikely to take on this task. Why is it “in the best interest of the children” to give the children to someone, other than the father who holds these primary responsibilities? Further to this, is the question of who pays the mother’s support. Despite the propaganda, almost no mother supports herself let alone her children. Mothers are, at least partially, supported by the money they receive for their children. Why is it “in the best interest of the children” for courts to order fathers to supply enough money to their children so that the children can support their mother? Surely, this is the reverse of what is supposed to happen: are not parents supposed to support their underage children?
Fourthly, the Children’s Act is gender free, why do judges almost exclusively give the children to the mother? Only 8% go to the father and this includes cases where the mother has deserted the family and the millionaires, who can spend a million pounds on lawyers to get custody. When I said to my solicitor, who was a “trainee” judge, that I wanted custody he said “you don’t stand a chance unless you can prove beyond any doubt that she is rolling around the floor drunk EVERY night or is on HARD drugs” (the EVERY and HARD were his emphasis). This implies that judges consider that any abuse less that this is an acceptable price for children to pay to live with their mother. How is this “in the best interest of the children”? This was especially highlighted when, a couple of years later, Bob Geldof got custody of his children with a reported cost of “almost a million”, subsequently the children’s mother died from a heroin overdose whilst she had care of the children. What my solicitor did not tell me was that even if she were a drunk or a hard drug addict, it would still cost me a million pounds before your courts would consider giving me custody. Do you consider this to be “in the best interest of the children”?
I find it incredible that people talk of mediation, which is like mending an iron girder with sellotape. You quite rightly say that you cannot legislate “mediation”, however, you can facilitate it by making it a viable option. Sitting two people down and saying now be reasonable and then saying to one “but if you’re not we will give you whatever you demand” is hardly likely to achieve anything worthwhile. If however you start from the 50/50 point you may get some positive result. Quite simply why should mother bother with mediation when the anti-family courts give them everything anyway? How do you consider that this is “in the best interest of the children”?
Fathers agree with Parliament that a principle of the Children’s Act should be “in the best interest of the children” but Parliament never intended that this should be the only criterion and to be used to such an extent that the whole of the Act could be erased and in its place could be this one phrase. Using this phrase judges commit any abuse of the law, children and fathers that they feel like, including not doing what is “in the best interest of the children”.
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
David Mortimer
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
“What welcome news this would make if it sees the light of day ! ! !
I don’t think the rest of the world quite know just how, over the years, we quietly we have slipped in to a secret court regime comparable to that demonstrated by Stalin’s Russia. No mention is made here of the 1968 Act which would also have to be repealed, ie Appellate Proceedings (Restriction of Publicity) Act 1968.
Munby was one of the first high court judges we targeted 10 years ago by protesting outside his ‘private’ London home and telling all his neighbours what he got up to [orphaning 100s of children] for his day job”.
http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed61385
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
David Mortimer
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
If all judgments are published that would allow us to know what each judge is doing on a daily basis.
http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed61385
The Bailii survey found that the judgments were also useful to legal academics and analysts, and the media. The published judgments had not produced a ‘feeding frenzy’ for the media, tracking down parties involved in published cases. It strikes me that if anything it is a good thing for the press to be able to have access to the court’s raw judgment, rather than relying on the account of a select few parties to the case.
http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2011/09/14/opening-up-the-family-courts-lucy-series/
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
David Mortimer
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
Are Facebook blocking me because I asked my ex if she was an alienating parent on facebook? Might explain the strange message they sent me about harrassing people on facebook. How on earth could any reasonable person our group ever consider it fair or right in any way to futhur censor me in any way is an appsolute disgrace. Nobody has the right to stop me from telling people the truth about the family courts. My ex refused to comply with the court order I had for contact & nothing was done about it. The Cafcass officer said it was not his job to tell the judge was would not comply. The judge would not enforce his own contact order. How can that be in my children’s best interests not to enforce it or for facebook to allow her to use the harrassment law against me for asking her if she now accepts what she did was wrong or not?
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
David Mortimer
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
Having read the draft proposals.
It is difficult to imagine anything more stupid.
We are back in the same old world, where they will still be giving information-classes – about what sort of case-outcomes there should be – without any information – on what sort of case outcomes … there should be.
The information that they are now going to deliver compulsorily is that they have no information to give.
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
David Mortimer
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
A court hearing re a marriage when the husband is not informed in advance about the hearing being held must be made illegal. It happened to me.
Notice the use of “best interest of the child” to exclude rights of a parent re access. Never any mention of the rights of a child to access to its parent. If we assert that a child has the right of access to its parent, which is in the best interest of the child anyway, this trumps the argument that the parents have no rights, because the best interests of the child take centre stage. Anyway, all evidence is that best interests of the child include access to its parent.
Court secrecy must end. For one thing false allegations would drop by 95%. They could not be made in the presence of neighbours.
Family courts must be prevented from making decisions as to violence “on the balance of probability”. Any such allegation must be transferred to the criminal court. After all, a proper definition of Domestic Violence would only include criminal offences. To include non-criminal offences within the definition of DV confuses and degrades criminal activity.
We need a law passed which gives a child the right of access to its parent.
We need a law passed which gives a parent the right of access to its child.
All legislation must have the caveat “so long as it is not a danger to the child” must be removed. Such caveats have no place in family law. Similarly, the law making education compulsory for a child does not have the caveat “so long as such education is not a danger to the child”.
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
James
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
Hi, please sign my petition so that me and my son can have the relationship we both deserve. Too many innocent fathers are being stopped from seeing their children because alienating mothers are using the children as weapons out of spite and to fulfil their own sick fantasies. Please give this little boy the chance of a happy, meaningful childhood with his dad. Many thanks.
http://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/the-courts-arrest-mothers-who-ignore-rulings-for-fathers-to-see-children
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
David Mortimer
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
I am not sure if Matt actually wants to seriously challenge or change the system or just make money & mislead people about what needs to be done but to date he has not changed the system or improved family law in any way. Change requires enough proof & support. Logic dictates that we must learn from what has already been said & done & do what history proves works like raising public awareness to what is wrong & what needs to be done in order to bring about real change. To date Matt has not done this or shown any real interest in looking at & using the documented evidence of what happened to the NATC Early Interventions project.
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
David Mortimer
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
“The European Court of Human Rights took the view that the German government had gone too far and found in favor of the father. ‘Tender Years Theory’ effectively prevents children from having a family life with their fathers”.
http://www.humanrights.is/the-human-rights-project/humanrightscasesandmaterials/cases/regionalcases/europeancourtofhumanrights/nr/643
“Lawsuit may bring hope to thousands of children and parents whose rights have been violated by bias and corruption in Canada’s family court system”.
http://www.nkmr.org/english/english_notice_board_massive_lawsuit_filed.htm
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
Steven Gilbert
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
Ever since studying law I have been taught that in the UK we all live in a society where each individual has equal rights to justice. However, thanks to our fantastic coalition government and their ingenious cuts (which includes cuts in legal aid) the majority of legal aid to family law will be abolished. So how can father’s be reasonably expected to put up a equal fight in court to gain access to their children through family litigation by means of legal aid? I feel more needs to be done to ensure that children have one father and one mother in their lives.
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
David Mortimer
Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/sites/fathers-rights.co.uk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/ultimate-google-analytics/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
Please can you tell me if a case man copy of my file can be used as evidence of bias in another court?